30 Coins

About 30 Coins

eSports and Bitcoin SV are a natural match -This article discusses the eSports and blockchain technology. Kronoverse CEO Adam Kling discusses why his company chose to build their new turn-based combat strategy game on Bitcoin SV. One key advantage cited was that their games didn’t need a second layer to interface with the blockchain allowing for real-time wagering on matches, with an auditable trail of transactions and game decisions.

iGaming use cases on Bitcoin – We save the best for last. This article discusses Bitcoin SV use cases for the iGaming industry.

Why gaming needs blockchain – iGaming legend Nick Hill breaks down several ways the Bitcoin SV blockchain will benefit the gambling industry, and how operators, players, regulators and others all stand to benefit from adopting the blockchain.

What is 30 Coins?

A great betting app should feel fast and stable, even on modest phones and slow networks. Nobody wants a crash or a lag right when a match is about to start.

Look for an app that offers live or in-play betting if you enjoy reacting to the game as it unfolds. Live odds update constantly and give you a completely different betting experience.

A clean, simple layout matters more than flashy design. Menus should be easy to navigate, and placing a bet should take only a few taps from the home screen.

What is 30 Coins?

Judge Kennedy explained in her ruling, “The court finds that Hasselback’s statements that continued representation in this matter would cause him to violate several ethical obligations trigger mandatory withdrawal under Model Rule 1.16(a) and is sufficient for granting his motion.” She added, “Hasselback need not be required to provide details, beyond his written motion, to establish that mandatory withdrawal is warranted,” and stated that requiring him “to specify the basis for his mandatory withdrawal could create the untenable situation of an attorney having to choose between his obligation of candor to the court and his obligation to maintain his client’s confidences.”

Unfortunately, because of that attorney-client privilege, it is difficult to know what types of ethical dilemmas Hasselback is facing. However, it’s likely just the mere hint at issues will be enough for IPI to find itself, once again, being more closely scrutinized. Where that leads is anyone’s guess, given gaming regulators’ reluctance to hold the company accountable for its actions.

IPI now has until this Friday to find a new lawyer to carry the six-case workload Hasselback had, but will most likely use this as an excuse to delay the ongoing legal battles. It won’t get very far with that, though, and perhaps Judge Kennedy expected IPI to try something. She added in her ruling that the attorney’s exit “may cause some delay, [but] that delay is not so much so that it would cause significant prejudice or adversely and materially affect the plaintiff.”